|
The Technique
High speed photography has a
long history.
The first systematic analysis of water droplet splashes was done by an
English physics professor by the name of A.M. Worthington in 1894 who
used a crude electric discharge to freeze the image of the splash on old
fashioned film plates. Over the years many photographers
have used modern equipment to improve the original technique, using high
speed flashes, electronic triggers and digital photography. It is now
possible to freeze every stage of the splash in minute detail.
Michael Melgar's contribution to this field has been to experiment with
variations in light and color to turn a scientific exercise into an
artistic one. Droplets of water are dropped into a tray of water and various
colored materials are placed near or under the tray to create the colors
seen in these photos. Occasional dyes are added to the water to get a
desired effect. A digital camera with a macro lens captures the images,
and a short duration flash is used to freeze them. Most of these images
were done by hand with precise timing and lots of practice, but some of
the more recent ones were done with the aid of an electronic trigger to
increase the level of precision and improve the capture rate. No computer techniques are used to create the
colors or shapes seen in these galleries. With the exception of some
cropping, and minor adjustments of brightness and contrast, they are as
nature created them.
I have been asked
on several occasion to explain the technique. While this is
nothing new and the technique has been reviewed elsewhere I can
give you a general outline of the technique for doing droplet
shots. The exact technique and apparatus you use depends on how
involved you want to get. My own technique has evolved through
multiples stages of sophistication over the past 11/2 years
since I started doing this. I started with an eye dropper, a
bright sunny day, and everything done manually. My setup has
gradually gone through dozens of modifications and is now a bit
more complex.
The beauty of this
type of photography is that it provides endless creative
possibilities in the confines of your own home. This is very
helpful when the days get short and the skies are gloomy.
First you need a
way to release the droplet in a consistent fashion so they
strike the same place every time. This allows you to manually
pre-focus your camera on the impact point.
You
need to design an apparatus to release the drops. How you do
this depends on how involved you want to get. A turkey baster,
an eye dropper, a plastic cup with a hole in the bottom, or a
syringe with some tubing will all work. If you are triggering
the shot manually its best ot have a constant flow of drops so
you don' have to release the drop and then try to trigger the
camera. The best method I found in the beginning was to build a
frame out of household materials -wood, pvc pipe etc, and then
clamp a plastic cup to the frame. If you use a tiny pin to poke
a small hole in the bottom of the cup you can get small droplets
to fall from the cup as a usable interval ( say 1 drop every
second or two). Later I got a little fancier using syringes and
tubing but that's not necessary if you're just getting started.
I now use an electronic valve to release the droplets in a more
controlled way. Once you've established your impact point, place
an object ( I like to use a large deck screw - the threads
provide a good surface to focus on) at the point of impact and
pre-focus the camera.
The trick to getting sharp photos lies not in the speed of
the shutter but in the duration of the flash. If you really want
sharp droplet photos, you need a good (but not necessarily
expensive) external flash. My shots were mostly taken at shutter
speeds of 2-3 seconds. I usually set the shot up in my basement
where I can get near dark conditions ( and no interruptions). I
used to leave enough light so I could see when the droplet was
released and then trigger the flash manually. With practice you
can get pretty accurate with the timing. Now I use a photogate (
this is an electric eye which senses the droplet passing buy and
after an adjustable delay it sends out a pulse to trigger the
flash) to trigger the flash. This allows a much higher capture
rate. There are several types of equipment available for this
depending on how much you want to spend.
-
The least expensive option
is to purchase a kit from HiViz
(http://www.hiviz.com/kits/kits.htm).
You will have to assemble the kit yourself but its very
inexpensive and has served me well. This is the timing
device I still use today. If you want to use it long term
you will need to purchase a few extra parts at radio shack
like a plastic 'kit box' to house the circuitry, and a
potentiometer with a stem that you can attach a knob to.
This will replace the potentiometer that comes with the kit
so you can adjust the delay more easily. The potentiometer
that comes with the kit has to be turned with a screwdriver
which is awkward and difficult. This device costs about $25
I believe plus a few dollars more for the parts at radio
shack.
-
The
Time Machine is a device produced by Bryan Mumford.
(http://www.bmumford.com/photo/camctlr.html).
The device is pre assembled and ready to go. You can
purchase sensors for various uses including photogates and
sound sensors, but its significantly more expensive to buy.
I believe it was about $350 last time I checked
The flash is the
key to getting sharp 'frozen' droplets. Flash duration is tied
closely to flash power. If you use the flash at maximum power
the duration of the flash will be longer. Conversely if you turn
the power all the way down you will get a very short flash
duration. This type of photography obviously benefits from the
shortest flash duration you can achieve. I purchased an old
Nikon SB28DX on Ebay for about $100 just for this purpose. When
the power is set to minimum the flash duration is about 1/28,000
second. This is much shorter than the 1/4,000 sec shutter speed
that most cameras are capable of. In the micro world of droplets
that small amount of time can be the difference between an OK
photo and one that freezes the action tack sharp.
Experimentation
makes this process so interesting. Colors can be added to the
scene by using colored liquids or placing colored objects in or
around the water. Different effects are generated depending on
the depth of the water, the temperature of the water, the height
of the droplet release and many other variables. This is
actually the trickiest and most important part of the whole
process. You can have a droplet photo that is technically
excellent and yet completely boring to look at if the lighting
and color do not bring something more to the image. I can't
really tell you too much about this for 2 reasons. First because
its taken hundreds of hours of experimentation to get the
lighting right and I don't want to give too much away. Second
because even I can't always repeat the results I have gotten.
This is because there are so many variables and sometimes a very
small change in just one of them can completely alter the
result.
Some basic principles will
help you get a good result though.
-
Take the flash off the camera. You need
to move the flash around to different heights and angles
in relation to the camera and surface of the water. You
will find sometimes that even a miniscule adjustment in
these parameters can make a huge difference in the
result you get
-
Place objects around the water container
that will add color to the image. Just as with the
flash, where you place the object can make all the
difference. I use a glass tray as the water container.
You can then place things above, below, and on the sides
and see how it affects the photo. Try different things -
solid color objects, patterns, flat objects, curved
objects. They will all give different results.
Finally, you may
have noticed that many of my more recent photos involve
collisions between several droplets. Droplet collisions are the
hardest type of droplet shots to do well because you not only
have to trigger the shot precisely, but you need to choreograph
the collision first. If you practice enough you will get an
occasional shot like on the left with manual droplet release and
a photogate flash trigger. Maybe one out of every 3-400 will
involve a collision if you're good. To get a shot like the one
on the right you need to have much more control than what can be
accomplished with manual control of droplet release and flash.

To get them
consistently you need an accurate way to control the amount and
speed of fluid release as well as the timing of the flash. If
you really want to try this type of shot its almost essential to
have a photogate and to use some type of electronic device to
release the droplets. It can be done manually and I managed a
few this way, but you could take a thousand shots and not get
one keeper.
The key is to keep experimenting and have fun.
Please feel free to browse our
galleries. Should you wish to purchase any of the images, they are
available as prints in a number of sizes. If you have any questions, you
may contact the artist through the link on the left side of this page.
|
|